Files
punktfunk/docs/releases
enricobuehlerandClaude Opus 5 e0427a3bb6
ci / rust (push) Canceled after 5m55s
ci / rust-arm64 (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / web (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / docs-site (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (--build-arg FEDORA_VERSION=44, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm, -f44) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/android-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-android-ci) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/arch-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-arch-ci) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/rust-ci-noble.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci-noble) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/rust-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders-arm64cross (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / apps (., web/Dockerfile, punktfunk-web) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / apps (docs-site, docs-site/Dockerfile, punktfunk-docs) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / deploy-docs (push) Canceled after 0s
android / android (push) Successful in 6m28s
feat(ci/android): a release tag without Play notes fails before it builds
Play does not show an empty "What's new" when the file is missing — it carries
the PREVIOUS release's text onto the new version. So the store listing ends up
describing a build nobody is getting, and nothing surfaces it except reading
the listing. That is the shape of the v0.22.3 notes announcing a feature the
tag never contained, and a soft warning in a log nobody reads does not prevent
it.

The gate runs FIRST in the job, before the ten-minute build: a miss costs a
second and leaves nothing half-published — no build, no assets on the Gitea
release, nothing on Play. It rejects three things: a missing file, a file
byte-identical to another release's (the same bug reached by copy-paste rather
than omission), and an empty or over-500-char one.

Length is checked here as well as in play-upload.py on purpose. The uploader
stays the last line of defence and is the only check android-promote.yml gets,
but it runs at step 9; this catches an unedited TEMPLATE copy at step 1. It
counts CHARACTERS, not bytes — Play's cap is 500 chars and `•` is three bytes
in UTF-8, so a `wc -c` check would have called the 356-char v0.23.0 notes 365
and can reject a legal file.

whatsnew/TEMPLATE.txt gives the file a starting point and says what the gate
does and does not enforce: it cannot tell whether the prose was ever edited, so
a copy that still reads "<The headline change>" ships exactly as written.

Canary stays exempt — no curated notes, and Play reusing text for internal
testers costs nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 10:34:32 +02:00
..

Release notes

One file per stable release: docs/releases/vX.Y.Z.md. Its contents become the Gitea release body verbatim and are the source of the Discord #releases announcement.

Why this exists

Releases used to be created by CI with an empty body; the notes were pasted in by hand afterward. That left a window where the release — and anything announcing it — carried no notes. Now the notes are authored before the tag is pushed, as part of the version bump, so the release is born complete and the announcement always has something to say.

The flow

  1. Write the notes. Add docs/releases/vX.Y.Z.md in the same commit (or PR) as the version bump. Copy TEMPLATE.md and fill it in. This file is the single source of truth for the body.
  2. Tag & push. git tag -a vX.Y.Z … && git push origin vX.Y.Z fans out to the build workflows. Whichever one wins the create race seeds the release body from this file (scripts/ci/gitea-release.shensure_release, and its PowerShell twin). The release page shows the notes immediately.
  3. Wait for green. Let every platform's CI finish and go green.
  4. Announce. Dispatch the announce workflow (.gitea/workflows/announce.yml) with the tag. It re-asserts this file over the live release (so any late edit wins) and posts an embed to Discord #releases. Pressing "go" is the quality gate — a half-built release is never announced. Stable-only; a -rc tag is refused unless allow_prerelease=true.

Editing the notes after the tag is fine: update this file, then re-run step 4 (or PATCH the body via the API) — the announce step always re-syncs from the file, so the file stays authoritative even across a tag re-point.

Canary / -rc builds have no file here on purpose: they get no curated body and are not announced.

Google Play "What's new": whatsnew/vX.Y.Z.txt

Play shows its own release notes on the Play Store listing and in the Play Store app, and caps them at 500 characters per language — the vX.Y.Z.md body is two orders of magnitude too long, so it gets its own short file: docs/releases/whatsnew/vX.Y.Z.txt.

Write it for a phone/TV user, not a host operator: only what changed in the Android app is worth their 500 characters. Plain text (Play renders no markdown), one bullet per line, same voice rules as below. Copy whatsnew/TEMPLATE.txt.

A vX.Y.Z tag without this file fails the android job before it builds. This is a hard gate, not a warning, because the failure it prevents is silent: when the file is missing Play does not show an empty "What's new" — it carries the previous release's text onto the new version, so the store listing describes a build nobody is getting, and nothing surfaces that but reading the listing. It is the same shape as the v0.22.3 notes announcing a feature that release never contained. The gate also rejects a file byte-identical to another release's, which is that bug reached by copy-paste instead of by omission.

The gate runs first in the job, so a miss costs a second and leaves nothing half-published — no build, no assets on the Gitea release, nothing on Play. Two more checks sit downstream: play-upload.py refuses text over the 500-char cap (printing the real count) before it uploads, because the API only rejects oversized notes at commit, by which point the AAB is already on Play.

Canary is exempt: it has no curated notes, and Play reusing text for internal testers costs nothing.

Same freeze rule as the notes: once the tag exists, this file is the record of what that versionCode shipped.

Voice & format

Write for the people who USE Punktfunk to stream their games and desktops — not for the people who build it. A non-engineer should finish knowing what's new and whether it affects them; an engineer should never be confused or forced to decode internals. (See any recent vX.Y.Z.md for the target.)

  1. Lead with the benefit. Each entry = what the user can now do, what now works, or what stopped going wrong — in their words. Implementation is not the story.
  2. No internal vocabulary in the body. No protocol/message names, code type names, hex codes or hardware IDs, crate/component names, or API symbols. Translate any essential detail to plain language. Name things users recognize (iPad, Apple Pencil, Steam Deck, Android TV, the Windows sign-in screen) — not subsystems.
  3. Group as New / Improved / Fixed, each a bold one-line lead-in + a tight plain explanation. Skimmable. The lead-in text before the first ## is what the Discord announcement shows, so make it a real, plain-language summary.
  4. Be specific and honest — no vague "various improvements"; a reader should know exactly what changed.
  5. Compatibility line up top, in plain terms: can they update one side at a time? does their existing setup keep working? No version numbers in the lead.
  6. All protocol / ABI / driver / embedder detail goes in ONE ## Under the hood (for developers) section at the very bottom — the only place internal names and version numbers belong, clearly optional. The old dense engineering style survives only there.

The short annotated-tag message stays separate and short (a headline + a paragraph); it is the tag object's message, not this file.