Files
punktfunk/docs
enricobuehlerandClaude Opus 5 e0427a3bb6
ci / rust (push) Canceled after 5m55s
ci / rust-arm64 (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / web (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / docs-site (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (--build-arg FEDORA_VERSION=44, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm, -f44) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/android-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-android-ci) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/arch-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-arch-ci) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/rust-ci-noble.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci-noble) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders (ci/rust-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / builders-arm64cross (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / apps (., web/Dockerfile, punktfunk-web) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / apps (docs-site, docs-site/Dockerfile, punktfunk-docs) (push) Canceled after 0s
docker / deploy-docs (push) Canceled after 0s
android / android (push) Successful in 6m28s
feat(ci/android): a release tag without Play notes fails before it builds
Play does not show an empty "What's new" when the file is missing — it carries
the PREVIOUS release's text onto the new version. So the store listing ends up
describing a build nobody is getting, and nothing surfaces it except reading
the listing. That is the shape of the v0.22.3 notes announcing a feature the
tag never contained, and a soft warning in a log nobody reads does not prevent
it.

The gate runs FIRST in the job, before the ten-minute build: a miss costs a
second and leaves nothing half-published — no build, no assets on the Gitea
release, nothing on Play. It rejects three things: a missing file, a file
byte-identical to another release's (the same bug reached by copy-paste rather
than omission), and an empty or over-500-char one.

Length is checked here as well as in play-upload.py on purpose. The uploader
stays the last line of defence and is the only check android-promote.yml gets,
but it runs at step 9; this catches an unedited TEMPLATE copy at step 1. It
counts CHARACTERS, not bytes — Play's cap is 500 chars and `•` is three bytes
in UTF-8, so a `wc -c` check would have called the 356-char v0.23.0 notes 365
and can reject a legal file.

whatsnew/TEMPLATE.txt gives the file a starting point and says what the gate
does and does not enforce: it cannot tell whether the prose was ever edited, so
a copy that still reads "<The headline change>" ships exactly as written.

Canary stays exempt — no curated notes, and Play reusing text for internal
testers costs nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 10:34:32 +02:00
..