`the_evidence_table_says_exactly_which_rungs_have_run_on_hardware` asserts the
same fact a third way — a proven list and a NOT-proven list, both spelled out —
so promoting the rung in the three places the handoff named still left a test
saying "the DXVA AV1 leg FAILS parity on two GPUs — claiming otherwise is the
dishonesty this program must not ship". It was right to fail; the pair moves
lists here.
Three prose sites that still described the leg as decoding wrong pixels move
with it: `native_supports_av1`'s device-facts note, `log_rung`'s honesty-surface
docs, and the OPEN question in the Windows Intel arm of `pick_native` — that last
one is marked CLOSED rather than deleted, because the question it raised (the
evidence filter asks "any evidence", and has no answer for BAD evidence) is a
real gap in the rule that outlived this particular leg.
enricobuehler
af4d265168