ci / bun-nix (pull_request) Successful in 38s
apple / swift (pull_request) Successful in 1m31s
apple / screenshots (pull_request) Skipped
ci / web (pull_request) Successful in 2m11s
ci / docs-site (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
windows / build (x86_64-pc-windows-msvc) (pull_request) Successful in 2m44s
windows / build (aarch64-pc-windows-msvc) (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
ci / rust-arm64 (pull_request) Successful in 6m29s
android / android (pull_request) Successful in 7m44s
ci / rust (pull_request) Canceled after 9m40s
nix / flake (pull_request) Canceled after 9m38s
The Intel Arc refusal moved one step down the caps query and stopped again: the coincide NV12 entry does not advertise SAMPLED. That sentence is punktfunk's, not the driver's, and the last two times a conclusion was drawn from a sentence of ours the conclusion was wrong. So --probe-decode now prints the driver's own answers instead. For every profile the client can negotiate (H.264 High, H.265 Main and Main 10, AV1 Main 8- and 10-bit) it asks vkGetPhysicalDeviceVideoFormatPropertiesKHR in six usage combinations — the three the image pools really create with, plus DPB|DST without sampling, SAMPLED alone and DST alone, which are what localise a refusal to a half. Each answer is printed as the driver gave it: format, usage and create flags named AND in hex with unrecognised bits called out, image type, tiling. A failed query prints its VkResult rather than vanishing into an empty list. It goes through pf-vkdecode's own query rather than a copy of it, which meant splitting query_formats into a physical-device form — the call never needed the VkDevice the old signature demanded. VideoFormat gains imageType and imageTiling to carry the whole record; VUID-VkImageCreateInfo-pNext-06811 compares both for equality, so they were being assumed rather than read. And because a driver that under-reports usage would be indistinguishable from one that genuinely lacks it, the probe asks a second, independent question — vkGetPhysicalDeviceImageFormatProperties2 over the same profile list — and prints it only where the two disagree. A disagreement is the finding. No behaviour change to any decode path: derivation reads the same fields it did.