Files
punktfunk/docs/releases
enricobuehlerandClaude Opus 5 4065b5bd03
ci / rust (push) Failing after 12s
ci / web (push) Successful in 58s
ci / docs-site (push) Successful in 1m7s
apple / swift (push) Successful in 5m29s
ci / bench (push) Successful in 7m56s
windows-host / package (push) Failing after 8m13s
windows-host / winget-source (push) Skipped
decky / build-publish (push) Successful in 1m1s
docker / build-push (--build-arg FEDORA_VERSION=44, ci, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm) (push) Successful in 12s
deb / build-publish (push) Successful in 9m28s
docker / build-push (., web/Dockerfile, punktfunk-web) (push) Successful in 1m7s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/rust-ci-noble.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci-noble) (push) Successful in 10s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/rust-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci) (push) Successful in 10s
docker / build-push (docs-site, docs-site/Dockerfile, punktfunk-docs) (push) Successful in 1m0s
deb / build-publish-host (push) Successful in 10m49s
android / android (push) Successful in 12m19s
deb / build-publish-client-arm64 (push) Successful in 11m37s
ci / rust-arm64 (push) Successful in 13m59s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Successful in 6m36s
rpm / build-publish (43, bazzite, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Failing after 7m45s
arch / build-publish (push) Successful in 21m57s
apple / screenshots (push) Successful in 25m13s
rpm / build-publish (44, fedora-44, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm) (push) Successful in 19m15s
docker / build-push-arm64cross (push) Successful in 8s
docker / deploy-docs (push) Successful in 30s
docs(gamescope): the missing cursor was never the whole story
"The mouse cursor isn't included in the captured image" sat in Known Limits
contradicting the section above it, which already explained that the host draws
the pointer back in. Both are half-true and the difference matters to a reader
choosing whether to install anything: gamescope does leave the pointer out, you
do still see one, and what it costs is a full pass over every frame — plus, on
the fastest encode paths, the pointer itself, because a fixed-function front
end has nowhere to blend it.

Which is the real argument for `punktfunk-gamescope` on a box that will never
turn HDR on, and the page never made it.

Release notes gain the spawn-flag verification and the packaging wiring.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-28 18:03:30 +02:00
..

Release notes

One file per stable release: docs/releases/vX.Y.Z.md. Its contents become the Gitea release body verbatim and are the source of the Discord #releases announcement.

Why this exists

Releases used to be created by CI with an empty body; the notes were pasted in by hand afterward. That left a window where the release — and anything announcing it — carried no notes. Now the notes are authored before the tag is pushed, as part of the version bump, so the release is born complete and the announcement always has something to say.

The flow

  1. Write the notes. Add docs/releases/vX.Y.Z.md in the same commit (or PR) as the version bump. Copy TEMPLATE.md and fill it in. This file is the single source of truth for the body.
  2. Tag & push. git tag -a vX.Y.Z … && git push origin vX.Y.Z fans out to the build workflows. Whichever one wins the create race seeds the release body from this file (scripts/ci/gitea-release.shensure_release, and its PowerShell twin). The release page shows the notes immediately.
  3. Wait for green. Let every platform's CI finish and go green.
  4. Announce. Dispatch the announce workflow (.gitea/workflows/announce.yml) with the tag. It re-asserts this file over the live release (so any late edit wins) and posts an embed to Discord #releases. Pressing "go" is the quality gate — a half-built release is never announced. Stable-only; a -rc tag is refused unless allow_prerelease=true.

Editing the notes after the tag is fine: update this file, then re-run step 4 (or PATCH the body via the API) — the announce step always re-syncs from the file, so the file stays authoritative even across a tag re-point.

Canary / -rc builds have no file here on purpose: they get no curated body and are not announced.

Voice & format

Write for the people who USE Punktfunk to stream their games and desktops — not for the people who build it. A non-engineer should finish knowing what's new and whether it affects them; an engineer should never be confused or forced to decode internals. (See any recent vX.Y.Z.md for the target.)

  1. Lead with the benefit. Each entry = what the user can now do, what now works, or what stopped going wrong — in their words. Implementation is not the story.
  2. No internal vocabulary in the body. No protocol/message names, code type names, hex codes or hardware IDs, crate/component names, or API symbols. Translate any essential detail to plain language. Name things users recognize (iPad, Apple Pencil, Steam Deck, Android TV, the Windows sign-in screen) — not subsystems.
  3. Group as New / Improved / Fixed, each a bold one-line lead-in + a tight plain explanation. Skimmable. The lead-in text before the first ## is what the Discord announcement shows, so make it a real, plain-language summary.
  4. Be specific and honest — no vague "various improvements"; a reader should know exactly what changed.
  5. Compatibility line up top, in plain terms: can they update one side at a time? does their existing setup keep working? No version numbers in the lead.
  6. All protocol / ABI / driver / embedder detail goes in ONE ## Under the hood (for developers) section at the very bottom — the only place internal names and version numbers belong, clearly optional. The old dense engineering style survives only there.

The short annotated-tag message stays separate and short (a headline + a paragraph); it is the tag object's message, not this file.