Files
punktfunk/docs/releases
enricobuehlerandClaude Opus 4.8 bda015b101
ci / web (push) Successful in 1m4s
ci / docs-site (push) Successful in 1m8s
apple / swift (push) Successful in 1m22s
decky / build-publish (push) Successful in 36s
docker / build-push (--build-arg FEDORA_VERSION=44, ci, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm) (push) Successful in 15s
docker / build-push (., web/Dockerfile, punktfunk-web) (push) Successful in 14s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Successful in 15s
apple / screenshots (push) Successful in 6m29s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/rust-ci-noble.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci-noble) (push) Successful in 5m1s
ci / bench (push) Successful in 8m1s
docker / build-push (docs-site, docs-site/Dockerfile, punktfunk-docs) (push) Successful in 18s
deb / build-publish-host (push) Successful in 10m19s
deb / build-publish (push) Successful in 12m13s
android / android (push) Successful in 13m20s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/rust-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci) (push) Successful in 6m26s
docker / deploy-docs (push) Successful in 24s
arch / build-publish (push) Successful in 16m53s
ci / rust (push) Successful in 25m37s
rpm / build-publish (44, fedora-44, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm) (push) Successful in 14m52s
rpm / build-publish (43, bazzite, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Successful in 18m8s
docs(release): rewrite v0.19.0 notes for end users + set end-user notes voice
Release notes were written for the people who build Punktfunk, not the people who use it —
dense with protocol/ABI/type names that confused even technical readers. Rewrite v0.19.0 in a
benefit-first, plain-language voice (New/Improved/Fixed) with all internal terms removed from the
body and every protocol/ABI/embedder detail moved to a single bottom "Under the hood" section.
docs/releases/README.md now codifies this voice as the format spec for all future notes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 20:15:08 +02:00
..

Release notes

One file per stable release: docs/releases/vX.Y.Z.md. Its contents become the Gitea release body verbatim and are the source of the Discord #releases announcement.

Why this exists

Releases used to be created by CI with an empty body; the notes were pasted in by hand afterward. That left a window where the release — and anything announcing it — carried no notes. Now the notes are authored before the tag is pushed, as part of the version bump, so the release is born complete and the announcement always has something to say.

The flow

  1. Write the notes. Add docs/releases/vX.Y.Z.md in the same commit (or PR) as the version bump. Copy TEMPLATE.md and fill it in. This file is the single source of truth for the body.
  2. Tag & push. git tag -a vX.Y.Z … && git push origin vX.Y.Z fans out to the build workflows. Whichever one wins the create race seeds the release body from this file (scripts/ci/gitea-release.shensure_release, and its PowerShell twin). The release page shows the notes immediately.
  3. Wait for green. Let every platform's CI finish and go green.
  4. Announce. Dispatch the announce workflow (.gitea/workflows/announce.yml) with the tag. It re-asserts this file over the live release (so any late edit wins) and posts an embed to Discord #releases. Pressing "go" is the quality gate — a half-built release is never announced. Stable-only; a -rc tag is refused unless allow_prerelease=true.

Editing the notes after the tag is fine: update this file, then re-run step 4 (or PATCH the body via the API) — the announce step always re-syncs from the file, so the file stays authoritative even across a tag re-point.

Canary / -rc builds have no file here on purpose: they get no curated body and are not announced.

Voice & format

Write for the people who USE Punktfunk to stream their games and desktops — not for the people who build it. A non-engineer should finish knowing what's new and whether it affects them; an engineer should never be confused or forced to decode internals. (See any recent vX.Y.Z.md for the target.)

  1. Lead with the benefit. Each entry = what the user can now do, what now works, or what stopped going wrong — in their words. Implementation is not the story.
  2. No internal vocabulary in the body. No protocol/message names, code type names, hex codes or hardware IDs, crate/component names, or API symbols. Translate any essential detail to plain language. Name things users recognize (iPad, Apple Pencil, Steam Deck, Android TV, the Windows sign-in screen) — not subsystems.
  3. Group as New / Improved / Fixed, each a bold one-line lead-in + a tight plain explanation. Skimmable. The lead-in text before the first ## is what the Discord announcement shows, so make it a real, plain-language summary.
  4. Be specific and honest — no vague "various improvements"; a reader should know exactly what changed.
  5. Compatibility line up top, in plain terms: can they update one side at a time? does their existing setup keep working? No version numbers in the lead.
  6. All protocol / ABI / driver / embedder detail goes in ONE ## Under the hood (for developers) section at the very bottom — the only place internal names and version numbers belong, clearly optional. The old dense engineering style survives only there.

The short annotated-tag message stays separate and short (a headline + a paragraph); it is the tag object's message, not this file.