Files
punktfunk/docs/releases
enricobuehlerandClaude Sonnet 5 c4e80fd455
apple / swift (push) Successful in 1m33s
android / android (push) Successful in 12m23s
arch / build-publish (push) Successful in 13m11s
ci / web (push) Successful in 56s
ci / docs-site (push) Successful in 1m5s
ci / bench (push) Successful in 5m47s
ci / rust-arm64 (push) Successful in 9m23s
ci / rust (push) Successful in 23m7s
apple / screenshots (push) Successful in 21m43s
deb / build-publish (push) Successful in 8m56s
deb / build-publish-client-arm64 (push) Successful in 7m24s
decky / build-publish (push) Successful in 32s
docker / build-push (., web/Dockerfile, punktfunk-web) (push) Successful in 40s
deb / build-publish-host (push) Successful in 9m55s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/rust-ci-noble.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci-noble) (push) Successful in 7m52s
docker / build-push (--build-arg FEDORA_VERSION=44, ci, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm) (push) Successful in 11m36s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Successful in 10m55s
docker / build-push (docs-site, docs-site/Dockerfile, punktfunk-docs) (push) Successful in 1m7s
docker / build-push (ci, ci/rust-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci) (push) Successful in 5m32s
docker / build-push-arm64cross (push) Successful in 4m23s
docker / deploy-docs (push) Successful in 31s
rpm / build-publish (43, bazzite, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Successful in 15m39s
rpm / build-publish (44, fedora-44, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm) (push) Successful in 15m8s
docs(release): v0.21.0 notes should only cover its own delta
Duplicated the entire v0.20.1 fix bundle verbatim instead of
following house convention (each vX.Y.Z.md covers only what changed
since the immediately preceding release file — see v0.19.1 -> v0.19.2,
neither restates the other). v0.20.1 is a real, already-tagged
release with its own notes file; 0.21.0 only needed to add the
monitor-streaming feature, the KDE registry fix found while building
it, and the CI-only winget fix, with a pointer back to v0.20.1 for
the rest.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-28 09:08:47 +02:00
..

Release notes

One file per stable release: docs/releases/vX.Y.Z.md. Its contents become the Gitea release body verbatim and are the source of the Discord #releases announcement.

Why this exists

Releases used to be created by CI with an empty body; the notes were pasted in by hand afterward. That left a window where the release — and anything announcing it — carried no notes. Now the notes are authored before the tag is pushed, as part of the version bump, so the release is born complete and the announcement always has something to say.

The flow

  1. Write the notes. Add docs/releases/vX.Y.Z.md in the same commit (or PR) as the version bump. Copy TEMPLATE.md and fill it in. This file is the single source of truth for the body.
  2. Tag & push. git tag -a vX.Y.Z … && git push origin vX.Y.Z fans out to the build workflows. Whichever one wins the create race seeds the release body from this file (scripts/ci/gitea-release.shensure_release, and its PowerShell twin). The release page shows the notes immediately.
  3. Wait for green. Let every platform's CI finish and go green.
  4. Announce. Dispatch the announce workflow (.gitea/workflows/announce.yml) with the tag. It re-asserts this file over the live release (so any late edit wins) and posts an embed to Discord #releases. Pressing "go" is the quality gate — a half-built release is never announced. Stable-only; a -rc tag is refused unless allow_prerelease=true.

Editing the notes after the tag is fine: update this file, then re-run step 4 (or PATCH the body via the API) — the announce step always re-syncs from the file, so the file stays authoritative even across a tag re-point.

Canary / -rc builds have no file here on purpose: they get no curated body and are not announced.

Voice & format

Write for the people who USE Punktfunk to stream their games and desktops — not for the people who build it. A non-engineer should finish knowing what's new and whether it affects them; an engineer should never be confused or forced to decode internals. (See any recent vX.Y.Z.md for the target.)

  1. Lead with the benefit. Each entry = what the user can now do, what now works, or what stopped going wrong — in their words. Implementation is not the story.
  2. No internal vocabulary in the body. No protocol/message names, code type names, hex codes or hardware IDs, crate/component names, or API symbols. Translate any essential detail to plain language. Name things users recognize (iPad, Apple Pencil, Steam Deck, Android TV, the Windows sign-in screen) — not subsystems.
  3. Group as New / Improved / Fixed, each a bold one-line lead-in + a tight plain explanation. Skimmable. The lead-in text before the first ## is what the Discord announcement shows, so make it a real, plain-language summary.
  4. Be specific and honest — no vague "various improvements"; a reader should know exactly what changed.
  5. Compatibility line up top, in plain terms: can they update one side at a time? does their existing setup keep working? No version numbers in the lead.
  6. All protocol / ABI / driver / embedder detail goes in ONE ## Under the hood (for developers) section at the very bottom — the only place internal names and version numbers belong, clearly optional. The old dense engineering style survives only there.

The short annotated-tag message stays separate and short (a headline + a paragraph); it is the tag object's message, not this file.