enricobuehlerandClaude Opus 5
020306b5ac
ci / web (push) Successful in 1m3s
ci / docs-site (push) Successful in 2m11s
ci / rust-arm64 (push) Successful in 2m41s
docker / builders (--build-arg FEDORA_VERSION=44, ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm, -f44) (push) Successful in 11s
docker / builders (ci/android-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-android-ci) (push) Successful in 11s
docker / builders (ci/arch-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-arch-ci) (push) Successful in 24s
deb / build-publish-client-arm64 (push) Successful in 2m28s
docker / builders (ci/fedora-rpm.Dockerfile, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Successful in 8s
docker / builders (ci/rust-ci-noble.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci-noble) (push) Successful in 7s
docker / builders (ci/rust-ci.Dockerfile, punktfunk-rust-ci) (push) Successful in 7s
docker / apps (., web/Dockerfile, punktfunk-web) (push) Successful in 13s
apple / swift (push) Successful in 4m48s
docker / apps (docs-site, docs-site/Dockerfile, punktfunk-docs) (push) Successful in 1m36s
arch / build-publish (push) Successful in 7m20s
ci / rust (push) Successful in 7m21s
deb / build-publish-host (push) Successful in 7m4s
docker / builders-arm64cross (push) Successful in 8s
deb / build-publish (push) Successful in 5m31s
docker / deploy-docs (push) Successful in 34s
android / android (push) Successful in 8m17s
windows-host / package (push) Successful in 10m43s
windows-host / winget-source (push) Skipped
windows-host / canary-manifest (push) Successful in 18s
rpm / build-publish (43, bazzite, punktfunk-fedora-rpm) (push) Successful in 16m40s
rpm / build-publish (44, fedora-44, punktfunk-fedora44-rpm) (push) Failing after 17m31s
apple / screenshots (push) Successful in 20m57s
Fallout from the documentation sweep: verifying doc claims against the code
turned up defects in the code and the shipped templates. Mostly comments that
describe behaviour we no longer have — which is how the docs went wrong in the
first place, since someone reads the comment and writes the page.
The one that mattered: a fresh deb/RPM/Arch install could not start the host at
all. The unit's `EnvironmentFile=` had no `-`, making host.env mandatory, and no
package creates it — all three ship only the templates under /usr/share and the
postinst merely prints the copy command. So `systemctl --user enable --now
punktfunk-host` died on "Failed to load environment files". Every field in
HostConfig::from_env resolves through unwrap_or/filter/None, so absent means all
defaults, exactly like a hand-run `serve`; the Nix module already wrote it as
`-${environmentFile}`. The Deck installer's own generated unit gets the same
prefix for the case where an operator later removes the file.
Shipped templates: PUNKTFUNK_SECURE_DDA is read by nothing (DDA/WGC are gone;
IDD-push is the sole Windows capture path and the secure desktop is
unconditional), so it stops being written into a fresh host.env;
PUNKTFUNK_INPUT_BACKEND offered a `uinput` value that does not exist and omitted
`kwin`, which is what a KDE session actually resolves to; PUNKTFUNK_RENDER_ADAPTER
no longer claims to pick a "Desktop-Duplication" GPU.
Comments corrected rather than deleted, since each explains a real why:
PUNKTFUNK_10BIT is default-on with explicit-off grammar, not an operator opt-in;
GNOME reaches EIS through Mutter's direct RemoteDesktop API, so it needs no portal
approval and is headless-capable; and the host does not run in session 0 — the
service is the session-0 supervisor and the host runs as SYSTEM in the interactive
console session, which is why game_term has to bind the input desktop at all.
packaging/bazzite/update-punktfunk.sh is now installed to /usr/share/punktfunk/,
so the command the docs promised exists.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>