undocumented_unsafe_blocks joins unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn in
[workspace.lints], and the ~100 scattered per-file #![deny(...)] attributes
(85 files) are deleted — a new crate, or a new module in an old one, is now
covered on creation rather than on remembering. The per-file form is how
pf-vkhdr-layer, wdk-probe and half of pf-clipboard stayed uncovered.
There are THREE workspaces, so the claim is made three times: the main
Cargo.toml, packaging/windows/drivers (workspace table + [lints]
workspace = true in all seven members), and packaging/windows/pf-vkhdr-layer
(its [lints] table, previous commit). pf-update now opts into workspace
lints; the two vendored member snapshots (cros-codecs, usbip-sim) stay out
deliberately and now both say so.
Newly-covered fallout was two link-sanity tests (pyrowave-sys, libvpl-sys)
— proofs written. Stale prose that claimed the workspace held
unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn at "warn" (it has been deny) or pointed at the
deleted attributes is corrected.
nvenc_core.rs is carved OUT of the unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn fence: its
exemption rationale ("raw entry-table calls almost line for line") was
false — the file makes zero FFI calls. Its unsafe surface is C-union writes
whose soundness hangs on which codec arm is active, and its own 4:4:4 note
records the shipped bug (hevcConfig bytes stamped onto an AV1 config) that
per-operation blocks make visible. It now runs the strictest discipline in
the crate: clippy::multiple_unsafe_ops_per_block at deny, one union access
per block, each naming its codec guard.
Verified here: cargo fmt clean in all three workspaces; native clippy
-D warnings clean for everything that compiles on macOS (the three
pre-existing mac-native failures — pf-client-core wol.rs, pf-encode
dead-code/closure-call, probe mic_burst — reproduce on the clean tree).
Linux/Windows legs ride the .25/.133 gate.
`packaging/windows/drivers/*` has run `deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)` +
`deny(clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks)` for a while, with `forbid(unsafe_code)`
on the modules that need no unsafe at all. The main workspace had no lint config
whatsoever, so nothing stopped a clean crate from quietly growing an `unsafe`, and
nothing distinguished the handful of genuinely-unsafe lines inside a 600-line
`unsafe fn` from the safe ones surrounding them.
Three things, all mechanical:
* `#![forbid(unsafe_code)]` on the eight crates that already contain zero unsafe
(`pf-driver-proto`, `pf-host-config`, `pf-paths`, the three clean clients, both
tools). These were clean by accident, not by contract; now they are clean by
contract.
* `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn = "warn"` workspace-wide. `unsafe fn` states a contract
the CALLER must uphold — it was never meant to switch off checking for the whole
body. Measured fallout is 300 sites on Linux, and they are concentrated: six
files carry all of them, while `punktfunk-core`, `pf-frame`, `pf-clipboard` and
`pf-vdisplay` are already at zero. `warn` (not `deny`) so the build stays green
while those six are worked down; it flips to `deny` once they are. This is also
the Rust 2024 default, so it pays off the edition migration early.
* `proc::current_uid()` replaces eight `unsafe { libc::getuid() }` blocks. Each
site had copied out the same SAFETY note verbatim, which is the tell: `getuid()`
is parameterless, always succeeds and touches no memory, so there is no contract
for a caller to uphold and no reason for the unsafe to be visible eight times.
One `unsafe` behind a safe wrapper, none at the call sites.
Verified: `pf-vdisplay` builds clean on Linux (Nobara) at zero E0133; the
macOS-buildable crates build clean locally. No behaviour change.
enricobuehler
