forked from unom/punktfunk
enricobuehler
c0f8f051c3
--probe-decode printed its DISPLAY position and called it the PUNKTFUNK_VK_DEVICE value. It is not. pick_device resolves that variable against the RAW vkEnumeratePhysicalDevices order (setup.rs, `devices.get(i)`) BEFORE any ranking runs, while the probe sorts discrete-first for readability. Those two orders disagree precisely on the hardware this flag exists to diagnose. pick_device's own comment records why the ranking is there: "enumeration order puts the iGPU FIRST on some hybrids (observed: Ryzen iGPU ahead of an RTX dGPU)". So on a hybrid laptop the number the probe printed for the iGPU could well be the number for the dGPU — a diagnostic handing out an actionable value that selects the other GPU, which is worse than printing none. Measured on the Arc + RTX 3500 Ada laptop, which is also where the first output went out with the wrong claim in it: three adapters, and the same Arc iGPU enumerated TWICE. So AdapterDecode now carries the raw enumeration index, captured before the sort, and the printer uses it; the "default presenter" marker stays on the first LISTED entry, because sorted-first is what pick_device lands on when nothing overrides. The duplicate is why the trailing hint names PUNKTFUNK_VK_ADAPTER as the safer knob and admits its limit: two adapters sharing a marketing name cannot be told apart by it, and a name match resolves to whichever enumerates first. The hint also states the thing this whole output invites a reader to get wrong — that a capable GPU in the list does not mean the decoder will use it, because Vulkan Video decodes on the presenter's device and PUNKTFUNK_DECODER does not move the presenter. Gates: fmt clean; clippy -D warnings on punktfunk-client-session and pf-presenter.