The capacity lever, taken: home-runner-1's LXC rootfs went 123 G -> 175 G
(`pct resize 116 rootfs +50G` on home-node-1, online, no downtime, thin pool had
~607 G spare). Free space went 77 G -> 124 G, which is the part that actually
gives three concurrent Rust builds room; the 10-minute prune is now a backstop
rather than the only thing standing between a push-storm and ENOSPC.
MIN_FREE_GB stays at 45. It is deliberately an absolute floor, not a percentage:
what three concurrent target/ dirs need does not change when the disk is resized,
but a percentage threshold silently does — 80% meant ~25 G free before and ~35 G
now. That is exactly why the percentage alone was the wrong instrument.
Also replaces the multi-line `{ …; } || { …; }` burst condition with two flat
tests into a flag. Same semantics, and shellcheck parses it — the brace-group
form across a line break did not survive an edit to the comment above it.
Truth-tabled: quiet at 25%/124G, fires on either signal alone, and stays quiet
when df returns nothing rather than treating an empty reading as pressure.
Deployed to home-runner-1; deployed md5 matches the repo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
arch has been failing with `as: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.47 assertion fail`, which
reads like a toolchain regression and is not one. The line above it is `can't
write 10 bytes to section .text._ZN6Vulkan...: 'No space left on device'` — the
assembler handling ENOSPC badly. Both recent arch failures are the runner filling
its disk, and by the time anyone looks, df reports 37% used.
Three things were wrong with the hygiene that was supposed to prevent this.
The cache cap and the burst-clear were dead code. They looked up the runner as
`docker ps -f name=gitea-runner-runner`, which matches zero containers now that
the replicas are `gitea-runner-fleet-runner-N-1`, so $RUNNER was always empty and
both branches were skipped. The store also moved: the fleet runs a standalone
cache-server bind-mounting a HOST directory, so no docker exec is needed at all.
The routine prune reclaimed nothing. `--filter until=6h` on a runner that rebuilds
its CI images every push means every image is younger than the window — measured:
0B reclaimed while docker system df reported 22.76 GB reclaimable. Now until=2h.
The burst guard never fired. It polled every 30 minutes for >=80% used, but three
concurrent Rust builds fill the disk and drain it again well inside that window,
so the poll kept landing on a healthy df. Now every 10 minutes, and it triggers on
a free-space FLOOR too — 80% of 123 G still leaves only ~25 G, which three jobs
swallow before the next poll.
Deployed to home-runner-1 and exercised: shellcheck clean, timer active on the new
interval, one run reclaimed 551 MB. Honest limit: this improves the odds, it does
not fix the cause. The remaining 22 GB of idle images are the fedora-rpm bases the
next run wants back, so there is no free headroom to reclaim — three replicas
building this workspace share one 123 G disk. The lever is capacity (grow the LXC)
or concurrency (drop to two replicas), and that is a judgement call, not a script.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The hourly docker-prune could never reclaim the real disk filler: the act_runner
cache server's blob store (cache.dir:"" -> /root/.cache/actcache/cache) lives in
the long-running runner container's WRITABLE LAYER, which docker prune can't see.
It grew to ~66 GB and filled the 125 GB disk on its own.
- New docker-prune.sh holds the logic (inline ExecStart= broke under systemd's
own $-expansion, which emptied $SZ/$(...) before sh ran them — silently no-oping
the burst guard). The unit now just calls the script.
- Caps the actcache: clears the blobs once they exceed ~20 GB (act_runner
repopulates; keys are content-hashed, so only stale entries drop).
- Burst guard lowered 85%->80% and now also clears the actcache.
- Timer hourly -> every 30 min; image/cache `until` 12h -> 6h.
Live: cleared 66 GB on home-runner-1 (93% -> 20%), deployed + verified.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
enricobuehlerandClaude Opus 5